Last November, AFB reported on an accusation of sexual harassment at the American Society for Aesthetics (ASA) Annual Meeting. Five days ago, AFB reported that the accused harasser was on the program for the upcoming ASA Annual Meeting, along with the accuser. Since then, a number of differing accounts have emerged regarding how the original accusation was lodged, largely via discussions on social media. In particular, some members of ASA leadership have stated that no official complaint was ever made by the accuser. The accuser has asked us to publish the following statement. Continue reading
Frank Boardman interviewed by Roy Cook for AFB
Frank Boardman is is a visiting assistant professor at Worcester State University. Most of his work has been in philosophy, art and rhetoric. He has a completely unwarranted belief that he could also write about parenting, technology or basketball. Continue reading
The Arthur Danto/American Society for Aesthetics Prize will be awarded to a member of the APA and the ASA for the best paper in the field of aesthetics, broadly understood, in a refereed journal, or an original book chapter or original essay published in a collection with a multiplicity of contributors. This prize is in honor of the late Arthur Danto, a past president of the APA Eastern Division.
The winner receives a $1,000 prize. In addition, a symposium in honor of the recipient of the prize is held at the APA Eastern Division meeting, normally the next such meeting following the selection of the prizewinner.
The nomination deadline is May 31, 2017.
Nominees must be members of both the APA and the ASA in the year of the nomination. For the inaugural award, nominated papers must have been published in 2015 or 2016. Nominations must be from a person who is a member of both the APA and the ASA at the time of nomination. Self-nominations are not permitted. To submit a nomination, fill out the Danto/ASA Prize nomination form.
We look forward to receiving your nominations!
What is the philosophy of jazz?
In a sort of order of strength of the foundational questions philosophers of jazz often research and pursue we have:
- What is jazz? Can it be defined? Does it have a musical essence? Are there necessary and sufficient conditions for a musical performance to be jazz? How does one determine if free jazz, or jazz-rock fusion is jazz? Was the movement to free jazz inevitable?
- Could Martians who know nothing about music on planet Earth play jazz? Why or why not?
- What is improvisation? Why is improvisation important to jazz? Can improvisation be taught? Are improvised (spontaneously composed) works inherently inferior aesthetically to pre-composed ones?
- What is a musical work? Does jazz have musical works? Can an improvised jazz performance be a musical work?
- What does the ideal jazz musician need to know? Why?
- How does the brain and mind work when playing and improvising jazz? What happens in a groove state or a flow state as it occurs during a jazz performance?
- Improvisers spontaneously compose creating fresh melodies over the continuously repeating cycle of chord changes in a song. Why should this be admired as aesthetically valuable activity? Why is this good?
- Can mistakes occur during a jazz improvisation? Which ones are not mistakes? How are mistakes possible? What kind of mistakes can occur during a jazz performance?
- Does playing jazz make a musician more spiritual? How has jazz contributed to freedom and creativity in the world?
- Does jazz have emergent properties?
And we have barely scratched the surface.
So writes David C. Ring (Orange Coast College), editor of the website Philosophy of Jazz and co-organizer of the Jazz and Philosophy Intermodal Conference, would like to invite readers to pursue these topics and questions (and enjoy some jazz jam sessions!) at the conference, May 5-7, 2017. Details below the fold.