Unraveling the mystery of a genre designed for women and by women, but with no women in them. Continue reading

February 20, 2025
by Aesthetics for Birds
13 Comments


February 20, 2025
by Aesthetics for Birds
13 Comments
Unraveling the mystery of a genre designed for women and by women, but with no women in them. Continue reading

September 8, 2022
by Aesthetics for Birds
1 Comment
Bad fans think morally condemnable characters are good and admirable. Are they wrong? Continue reading

May 18, 2019
by Aesthetics for Birds
0 comments
What follows is a guest post by James Harold, Professor of Philosophy at Mount Holyoke College. Parts of this blog post draw from his article “The Value of Fictional Worlds (or, Why The Lord of the Rings is Worth Reading).” Critics and fans approach certain works (like The Lord of the Rings or Star Wars) very differently. The critics evaluate these works on their own merits, considered as art objects in their own right, while fans consider in terms of their contribution to a larger world of play and creative exploration. While philosophers, like art critics, have spent a lot of time thinking about artworks, they have spent relatively little time thinking about this playful, participatory world, the world that is the focus of fan culture.

September 17, 2014
by Aesthetics for Birds
24 Comments
Why aren’t aestheticians talking about shipping? Bence Nanay discusses this and other problems of elitism in aesthetics. Continue reading